They wrote Before We're 64 which appeared in The Washington Post on November 5. Surely this is of interest for many in this area where so many were and still some are employed by companies providing health care benefits.
We can't afford to let American workers and companies wither on the vine. We can ease the cost crunch for both by giving employers and unions a new option: buying Medicare coverage for retirees ages 55 to 64. Retirees would get quality care from a program they can trust. Employers would get to buy affordable insurance and take spiraling health costs off their books.
***
A Medicare buy-in for retirees ages 55 to 64 won't cost taxpayers. Companies could pick up most of the cost; instead of GM contributing $30 billion to a VEBA, that money would go to Medicare. Retirees would have to pay higher premiums than traditional Medicare beneficiaries do to receive health care.
Taxpayers would also benefit, because the more we can do to make Americans healthier from 55 to 64, the less Medicare will have to spend on chronic conditions later.
For many companies, buying into Medicare would be the most affordable option. It could make the difference in whether companies are able to compete -- and whether companies are able to provide retiree health coverage.
Meta Scandals And Controversies
-
Tracking scandals and controversies involving Meta, the parent company of
Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. Meta Changed Content Policy, Allowing
Women To ...
The Southwest Airlines Debacle
-
A good technical explanation and a refreshing suggestion: that the remedy
is removing the liability shield and allowing the threat of serious
financial con...
[12+] Dance Moms Abby
-
Created by Collins Avenue Productions the show follows the training and
careers of children in dance and show business under the tutelage of Abby
Lee Mil...
Broken Links Corrected
-
I did a design theme update to the site, so it looks a bit different these
days. There will be some more tweaks as I customize the theme a bit more,
but it...
Bank accounts
-
They're where the money is. Right? Today we want to compare a couple of
public accounts and the relationship between them. One is Indianapolis
public schoo...
Let Bannon and Trump talk. We’ll report.
-
*When a top White House* aide called *The New York Times* on Wednesday to
offer up the sort of cartoonish, press-hating invective that has
characterized Pr...
The Real Motivation of the Pain Caucus
-
Above: Publication Appearing in 3 Weeks At Your Dentist’s Office Insults
Your Intelligence Time Magazine made the smart decision to put its dumb
cover stor...
How did Wisconsin become a cesspool?
-
Well, there's "Anything Goes" with the judges. These writings have
far-reaching implications, not just for the John Doe investigation
underlying the instan...
The Return!
-
Stay tuned...what was once Indy's Painfully Objective Political Analysis
(iPOPA) is undergoing a transformation, but it will be back soon!
This blog has moved
-
This blog is now located at http://blog.animalswithinanimals.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subs...
Trouble with the CIB
-
Well folks your friendly neighborhood Capitol Improvement Board
("CIB")needs some help.
You might recall that the CIB is the quasi-government agency that r...
Dartmouth Law Journal calling for papers
-
The Dartmouth Law Journal (DLJ) is a scholarly law review published three
times a year by undergraduate students under the auspices of the
Rockefeller Cent...