Indiana Law Blog wrote about a GAO report on presidential signing statements here. I find this subject really gripes me. The President is bound to execute the law and not write it. If the President does not like the law, he can veto the law. What we get with Bush is a fellow who cannot veto but instead tells Congress how he will (or will not) execute the law.
Anyone want to guess what the Republican response would have been if Clinton had done the same as Bush is doing?
Comments for this post
‘We Will Do This Again,’ Afghanistan IG Warned In 2021 Of Future Drawn-Out
Wars
-
*SIGAR QUARTERLY REPORT - July 2021*
*"MILITARY TIMES" By Meghann Myers*
*"Sopko is not, he said, optimistic that the national security
establishment...
2 days ago
