Washington Post article on their local transportation problems

As Governor Daniels's toll road ideas continue to raise hackles here, the Washington Post examines the problems in Virginia. The problem seems different than from here but might be worth reading for some insights. Certainly, it shows the timidity masquerading as boldness that is Mitch Daniels.

Mass transit hearing - Terri Austin news

From Jim Shella's blog:

February 1, 2007 12:11 pm

Those who feel the Transportation Committee in the state Senate gave too little attention to mass transit issues while passing a toll road bill the other day will be happy to know that the House Roads Committee will take a different approach.

Chairman Terri Austin plans a February 14th hearing with national experts coming to discuss mass transit possibilities.

Austin says she wants to raise the debate to a new level.

I assume the Governor's Tollroad to Nowhere is to be included in the discussion.

The Interstate Commerce Connector lives on

Thank goodness for Taking Down Words. Between work, writing some articles and starting another blog, I have not been able to write anything on this subject. I probably ought to be embarrassed by this. I think this is the most important state initiative in the area. As I also think it barely rates being described as a crock, I should have been doing better. I started this on January 20 so some of it may be a bit dated.

There is a new website on the Governor's toll road proposals. Again, kudos to Taking Down Words for pointing the way. Alltollded.com has a page for the ICC called Indy Bypass Toll Road.

TDW provided the pointer to article by the Indianapolis Star's Matt Tully: Mass transit gets stuck in slow lane at Statehouse. Madison County got a mention besides Senator Lanane:

Jerrold Bridges, with the Madison County Council of Governments, traveled from Anderson to support Lanane's bill. He said many areas competing with Indianapolis for life-science jobs are far ahead when it comes to public transportation.

He pointed to air quality benefits, economic development potential around rail stops and young workers who enjoy walkable cities where your car doesn't dictate your life.

"It's a competitive issue, as well as a quality-of-life issue," Bridges said.

I would suggest that there is no great distinction between the competitive issues and the quality-of-life-issues. Also, I suggest reading the TDW post, especially the comments. I got to admit that I find myself annoyed by the myopic view of some but there is a comment about costs that has not been rebutted.

I am glad to see our Senator Lanane getting behind this idea. I know that he has been interested in the idea for the past few years.

I found this on Matt Tully's blog:

Paging Bart Peterson

Posted by Matt Tully

The most interesting part of yesterday's Senate committee hearing on the new suburban Indianapolis toll road came when Sen. Jean Breaux spoke up.

"I'm curious why there would be no one representing Marion County in the discussion," she said, about planning for the new toll road.

Committee Chairman Thomas Wyss looked stunned, saying, "This is economic development at its best." He argued the new bypass would be fantastic for Marion County. He was puzzled by the concern coming from Breaux, an Indianapolis Democrat. It was as if Wyss, R-Fort Wayne, had never even considered the idea that a toll road meant to spur development outside of Indianapolis could actually harm the city.

"We don't know that it's going to be economically beneficial," Breaux said.

She's right. But you really can't blame Wyss. After several weeks of debate about the new toll road, Mayor Bart Peterson has declined to express his support or opposition. Indianapolis isn't trying to be a player in this issue.

It's surprising that an Indianapolis mayor would stay out of a debate that could have an impact on the city for generations. But most believe Peterson either does not want to offend Gov. Mitch Daniels, or is certain Democratic House Speaker Pat Bauer will kill the idea when it moves to the House.

The Noblesville Ledger attended another of Gustin's road shows. I-69 needs attention, says resident.

We all know we need economic development. We all want economic development. So we are going to be susceptible to any offer of a better economy. However, the Governor has not shown one iota of fact to support his claim that this will benefit anyone other the company who gets the contract to build the road.

Compare the Governor's sales pitch with this from Alltolled:

This study concluded that, if a freeway were built to totally encircle Marion County, it would reduce traffic volume on the very NE corner of I-465 between I-69 and I-70 as well as the west and northern legs of I-465. It would also reduce traffic on I-69 between the new freeway and I-465 as well as traffic on SR 9. But, the freeway beltway would also increase traffic on I-70 between this new beltway and I-465.

The study further concluded: "These travel simulations indicated that most I-69 traffic was either destined for the Indianapolis region or would use I-465 to travel through the study area. The need for a new freeway bypass of Indianapolis to serve I-69 traffic was not indicated."

Some updates on the Interstate Commerce Connector

Frankly, I was beginning to think Mighty Mitch's new toll road was dead so I neglected a few reports on the subject. Looking around the web shows that Mitch is talking out of both sides of his mouth. This is from the Herald-Bulletin on the 12th:

“Right now our focus is on legislation that would allow the governor and the administration to explore P3 agreements for projects such as the Commerce Connector,” said Jamie Jorczak, director of communications and marketing for INDOT during a visit to The Herald Bulletin.

“Our focus is not so much on breaking ground or where it’s going to go, those things will come with our studies. Our focus right now is on the authority to explore that path.”

On Monday, the opening day of the Legislature, bill No. 001 was introduced in the Indiana Senate. The bill would allow INDOT to explore P3 agreements and must be passed by mid-February to move onto the Indiana House before the end of the legislative session on April 29.

Taking Down Words has a post here on the private/public partnership proposals which leads to an INDOT page on public-private partnerships here. I have seen 2:00 am infomercials which did not salivate so heavily with self-love as this page. ("Governor Daniels has received national recognition and awards for his leadership and use of public-private partnerships in addressing Indiana’s transportation infrastructure needs." I think he got some award from some trucking industry group for his toll road lease/sale which is his only private-public transportation deal to date.). In case anyone forgot here is the general plan:

In P3 agreements, private sector funding is used to design, build, finance, maintain and operate a public facility:

• In return for paying to create the road, and also paying a premium above this cost, the company collects tolls on the facility for a designated time period.
• The highway remains a publicly-owned asset, and it must be maintained to state and federal standards.
• State officials monitor the management of the facility and set the parameters for toll increases over the life of the agreement.

No mention of what happens when the private company goes bankrupt is there? Hmm.

But that page will take you to this INDOT page with a nice map of where the Governor thinks the route should go (I cam beginning to think the guy thinks he is Kevin Costner in Field of Dreams - build it and they will come). With more hype paid for by our tax dollars:

• Local officials across Central Indiana support the Indiana Commerce Connector and call it an innovative plan to attract new investment and jobs to their communities.

For those of us in Madison County, look at that map closely. The exit off of I-69 is west of Pendleton and east of the Lapel exit. It appears to come between Pendleton and Ingalls. I suspect it comes very close to some state owned land in Pendleton - the Reformatory. I think Highway 67 would be about two miles south of the I-69 exit. I call that pretty cramped territory for development in an area of farms and some nice housing developments. Pretty cramped, too, from the perspective of the Lapel exit where new housing lots are going up. From there south through Hancock County - west of State Road 9.

For those of us in Anderson, think about a route that is about ten miles away from us. Consider that it is even further to the west of State Road 109 which is a more direct route from I-70 than State Road 9. Just what local officials did Mighty Mitch find that like his plan?

I got to admit that I found this point amusing:

The Indiana Commerce Connector will improve access to Indianapolis International Airport, making it easier for Hoosiers and companies to use this tremendous transportation hub.

Yes, I want to go to the Indianapolis airport by way of Shelbyville and Mooresville when the gas is over $2.00 a gallon. I now have a division in my mind which seems evenly balanced: between anger that the Governor thinks we are stupid and anger over the Governor's lack of common sense.

I must report one good thing (thanks, again, to TDW), even the Republicans are balking at Mitch's road to nowhere.

An aside about the Herald-Bulletin's article, I noticed that the online comments section was empty even though I left a comment there two days ago. I commented that the Governor had not been show that the project would bring the growth he projected. Considering how well the Governor projected the costs of our Iraq fiasco, I think we should severely doubt his abilities to predict anything.