In case anyone wants to see the opinion, click here. No, I have not read the opinion but have only heard the news reports. My understanding is that the problem lay in this being a facial attack - that the law on its face is bad. Hard cases to make and even harder with our current Supreme Court's dislike of upholding civil rights. The case might have been different if those attacking the law could have found someone injured by the law. But then it would not have been a facial attack.
I think the better idea is to get a better General Assembly and get rid of this law.
Gaining Trust By Listening Then Learning From Each Other
-
*We have grown acclimated to viewing the world through media sound bites
and opinionated, biased news, financed by those that spend enormous amounts
of ...
21 hours ago